blogan Rotating Header Image

A Calorie-Neutral Lunch

starbucks According to an online walking calorie calculator, I used 99 calories walking to Starbucks and another 99 walking back to work. Starbucks’ online nutrition information page says my grande, two-pump, non-fat, no-whip, white chocolate mocha is 350 calories.

Looks like I need to nearly double my route’s distance to have a calorie-neutral walk.

Update. I forgot to subtract 120 calories for the two fewer pumps of white mocha syrup, which decreases the drink’s calories to 230. That’s pretty close to calorie neutral as-is! Not bad, considering a standard grande white chocolate mocha is 470 calories.

Update 2. Okay. I was so close, I had to map my walk. It’s actually 1.21 miles, not 1.0. That means I burn 240 calories. Yes! That’s 10 more than in the drink—better than neutral. :-)

___
According to my calculations, while walking, I’m using nearly the same energy as six 60-watt light bulbs. Let’s just stipulate that I’m not carbon neutral. ;-)
Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/elpatojo/ / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Related Posts with Thumbnails

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

snowflake